discuss and select from logo designs #1185
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1185
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
There has been some discussion on tahoe-dev and within IRC regarding new logo designs.
This ticket will serve to hold the summary of discussion and candidates.
We'll close this ticket with a selection of logo moving forward.
Attachment rycee1.png (6659 bytes) added
Robert Helges 2010-08-24
Attachment sam1.png (32922 bytes) added
Sam Mason 2010-08-24
Attachment kelly1.png (38080 bytes) added
Kelly Marks 2010-08-23
Attachment zooko-orig.png (7628 bytes) added
Zooko's original .org logo
Attachment kpreid1.png (7125 bytes) added
Kevin Reid 2009-07-19
Attachment kpreid2.png (4431 bytes) added
Kevin Reid 2010-05
discuss and select logo designsto discuss and select from logo designsI showed these to Sebastian Kuzminsky and Dan Wontoner (not his real name) and they both preferred kpreid1.png . I'm partial to it myself. kpreid1.png and rycee1.png are my current favorites.
My current favorite is Sam's first attempt, upper left in attachment:sam1.png.
I think it's solid, strong, easily readable, distinctive at different scales and in black/white, and follows the red/white color scheme explained by Zooko as having importance with regards to the security and confidentiality properties of Tahoe-LAFS.
My favourites are also Sam's first two attempts. The black dots in the snowflake are slightly too heavy in the right-hand one and slightly too light in the left-hand one; maybe something in-between. I agree with the meaningfulness of the red/black snowflake design.
Hm, so the one that is currently on http://tahoe-lafs.org is kpreid2.png . Does anybody want to agitate to change to a different one? Or shall we close this ticket and declare kpreid2.png to be the official logo?
Also kpreid, could we please have an svg of that?
kpreid (and everyone): could you please give us a liberal license like some Creative Commons licence to use your image. (In particular, I'm uploading it to commons.wikimedia.org, and they want to know if I have appropriate rights to do so...)
I hereby license the images named here kpreid1 and kpreid2 under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The source SVG documents, theoretically available at http://switchb.org/kpreid/2009/tahoe/ , will be updated with this licensing information, uh, as soon as my web server is back up. (Nice timing, Linode!)
I'd like to agitate.
I still agree with myself in comment:79828 - I prefer Sam's first attempt. I also think that davidsarah's comment:79829 makes sense, and would be happy to see an in-between version.
I think selecting a logo by 'default' is lazy.
Kelly grants Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-SA) to her efforts (attachment:kelly1.png).
[to fix comment references]edited
sirvaliance-logo-proposal-1.jpg is showing up as an invalid JPEG for me in three different programs.
Attachment sirvaliance-logo-proposal-1.jpg (623757 bytes) added
sirvaliance logo proposal 1, from #1475
Hm, I remember more people having opinions than I see on this ticket. Maybe there was a discussion on the tahoe-dev list. Anybody have links to it?
(http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2009-July/002339.html)
http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-May/004361.html
http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/005049.html
and http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/005043.html
As already mentioned on IRC, I like the current logo best
Attachment rycee2.png (5369 bytes) added
Since everybody (including me) dislike the font I chose in my submission I thought I'd rectify this unfortunate situation with another, somewhat more awesome, submission.
Attachment tahoe-lafs_logo_dloss3.png (105980 bytes) added
added for dloss
Attachment tahoe-lafs_logo_dloss3.svg (18946 bytes) added
added for dloss
added dloss's image
I noticed the web interface/website were lacking a favicon, so I made one based on Kevin Reid's logo:
http://marcus.wanners.net/tahoe-icon.png
http://marcus.wanners.net/tahoe-icon.svg
(CC BY 3.0)
If anyone thinks it's a good idea, I can set about making a patch to add this to the web interface. I haven't hacked on the source yet though, so it might not be pretty.
Replying to marcusw:
Note: marcusw went ahead and did this -- #1592.