Upload (sometimes?) ignores shares.happy in tahoe.cfg #1830
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1830
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
kmarkley86 at /tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/6274#comment:41:
A subsequent patch on trunk added assertions to try to catch the problem:
kmarkley86: can you try again to reproduce the problem [] using trunk?
kicking to 1.11 until we get this reproduced with the new assertions
Could this be related to #1847?
No, the proposed cleanup on #1847 does not affect the behaviour:
as expected. That is, modifying
self.DEP
does not affect the shadowedFoo.DEP
, and there's nothing else that the proposed change on #1847 would fix.I'm unable to reproduce this problem on trunk with a unit test. Here is the test I've written:
After thinking about this a little bit, it might be better to refactor and remove all default constants in the source. That way this problem could not occur.
Replying to markberger:
+1 ! That was my thinking in #1847.
At the meeting today we decided to punt this into 1.12 . The suggested cleanup is a great idea (if it's not already cleaned up.. I thought we'd done a pass on this once already). The goal will be to have exactly one place where default k/h/N are specified, in client.py where the config file is read.
Milestone renamed
renaming milestone
Moving open issues out of closed milestones.
Ticket retargeted after milestone closed