LAFS does not come with a pony #1736

New Issue

tahoe-lafs · 2012-05-14T00:07:37Z

davidsarah commented

2012-05-14 00:07:37 +00:00

On 13/05/12 08:55, Michael Rogers wrote:

I want a pony.

We're not currently able to package a pony with LAFS; this is a limitation of setuptools.

On 13/05/12 08:55, Michael Rogers wrote: > 9. I want a pony. We're not currently able to package a pony with LAFS; this is a limitation of setuptools.

tahoe-lafs added the

labels 2012-05-14 00:07:37 +00:00

tahoe-lafs added this to the eventually milestone 2012-05-14 00:07:37 +00:00

davidsarah commented

2012-05-14 00:11:03 +00:00

According to the Roadmap, this is slated for 2.0.

According to the [Roadmap](https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/roadmap), this is slated for 2.0.

tahoe-lafs modified the milestone from eventually to 2.0.0

2012-05-14 00:11:03 +00:00

davidsarah commented

2012-05-14 17:26:16 +00:00

As a temporary workaround, you can add an image of a pony in, say, $BASEDIR/public_html/pony.jpg, and then it will be served at <http://$GATEWAY:$PORT/static/pony.jpg> (I think; needs testing). I realize this is a poor substitute for the real thing.

As a temporary workaround, you can add an image of a pony in, say, `$BASEDIR/public_html/pony.jpg`, and then it will be served at `<http://$GATEWAY:$PORT/static/pony.jpg>` (I think; needs testing). I realize this is a poor substitute for the real thing.

davidsarah commented

2012-07-12 16:03:37 +00:00

I'm pleased to see that warner is considering forward-compatibility issues for this ticket in the accounting branch.

I'm pleased to see that [warner is considering forward-compatibility issues for this ticket in the accounting branch](https://github.com/warner/tahoe-lafs/blob/accounting-2/src/allmydata/storage/account.py#L30).

warner was assigned by tahoe-lafs

2012-07-12 16:03:37 +00:00

davidsarah commented

2012-10-01 17:50:28 +00:00

Replying to davidsarah:

I'm pleased to see that warner is considering forward-compatibility issues for this ticket in the accounting branch.

The forward-compatibility offer of a pony regrettably had to be backed out as part of simplifying the branch.

Replying to [davidsarah](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1736#issuecomment-88524): > I'm pleased to see that [warner is considering forward-compatibility issues for this ticket in the accounting branch](https://github.com/warner/tahoe-lafs/blob/accounting-2/src/allmydata/storage/account.py#L30). The forward-compatibility offer of a pony regrettably [had to be backed out](https://github.com/daira/tahoe-lafs/commit/754d3262555c90b32cc05eabf177f062cd73d1ba) as part of simplifying the branch.

daira commented

2013-08-06 00:07:44 +00:00

Maybe setuptools 0.9 (see #2044) will support this use case?

daira commented

2013-08-07 18:03:40 +00:00

Having read this sobering treatise on possible long-term consequences of this feature, I think perhaps we need to give more serious consideration to the potential down-sides.

Having read [this sobering treatise](http://www.fimfiction.net/story/62074/1/friendship-is-optimal/prologue-equestria-online) on possible long-term consequences of this feature, I think perhaps we need to give more serious consideration to the potential down-sides.

tahoe-lafs modified the milestone from 2.0.0 to undecided

2013-08-07 18:03:40 +00:00

tahoe-lafs changed title from ~~Tahoe does not come with a pony~~ to LAFS does not come with a pony

2013-08-07 18:08:51 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.