separate configuration from instantiation of Client instance #1548
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1548
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I'm writing tests of configuration, and currently reading values from the configuration and using them is done inside the constructor of [Client]source:trunk/src/allmydata/client.py?annotate=blame&rev=5232#L111. I would rather there be some separate code that reads the values from configuration and does whatever validation and parsing is necessary and then passes all configuration options as arguments to the constructor of the class. This would be as prescribed in [the CodingStandards document](wiki/CodingStandards).
Here is a patch to rename
Client
toClientAndServer
and to put a little shim into place so that .tac files can continue invokingallmydata.client.Client
.Attachment renameClient.dpatch (6695 bytes) added
renameClient.dpatch causes this test failure (looks like just a missing rename):
Attachment 1548-fix-missing-rename.darcs.patch (7776 bytes) added
test/test_upload.py: fix a missing rename of client to clientandserver. refs #1548 (Includes previous patch.)
Hm, what's the status of this patch? Is it ready for code review?
I'd forgotten all about this ticket. The patch will need redoing for git, but I approve in principle of making this change after 1.11.
Milestone renamed
renaming milestone
Moving open issues out of closed milestones.
Ticket retargeted after milestone closed