test-from-egg and test-from-prefixdir are not testing the right code #1137

Closed
opened 2010-07-26 07:04:00 +00:00 by davidsarah · 20 comments
davidsarah commented 2010-07-26 07:04:00 +00:00
Owner

The test-from-egg and test-from-prefixdir buildbot steps are supposed to be testing the same code that was built, but they may actually test a previous version that is installed in site-packages.

For example,

are supposed to be testing [1.7.1-r4600 on the ticket1074 branch]source:ticket1074@4600, but are actually testing the 1.7.1 release.

The test-from-egg and test-from-prefixdir buildbot steps are supposed to be testing the same code that was built, but they may actually test a previous version that is installed in site-packages. For example, * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/Kyle%20OpenBSD-4.6%20amd64/builds/316/steps/test-from-egg/logs/stdio> * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/Kyle%20OpenBSD-4.6%20amd64/builds/316/steps/test-from-prefixdir/logs/stdio> are supposed to be testing [1.7.1-r4600 on the ticket1074 branch]source:ticket1074@4600, but are actually testing the 1.7.1 release.
tahoe-lafs added the
dev-infrastructure
critical
defect
1.7.1
labels 2010-07-26 07:04:00 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added this to the soon (release n/a) milestone 2010-07-26 07:04:00 +00:00
davidsarah commented 2010-07-26 22:43:23 +00:00
Author
Owner

I wrote in the original description:

To detect this problem, we could have the commands that run these steps set an environment variable, say REQUIRED_TAHOE_VERSION, and then fail the tests if that is set and doesn't match allmydata.*version*.

Actually this wouldn't be enough. We're not just supposed to be testing the right version, we're supposed to be testing a specific egg or installation, so that we know that it is usable (not missing any needed files, for example). So we need to:

  1. Fail if the code we are testing is not loaded from the expected egg or prefix directory.
  2. Fail if the code in that directory is not the right Tahoe version. (Or, equivalently given that check 1 passes: fail if the code we are testing is not the right Tahoe version.)
  3. Run the tests in such a way that the preceding checks don't fail.

We should also consider checking constraints on the versions of our dependencies, but I think that's a separate ticket.

I wrote in the original description: > To detect this problem, we could have the commands that run these steps set an environment variable, say `REQUIRED_TAHOE_VERSION`, and then fail the tests if that is set and doesn't match `allmydata.*version*`. Actually this wouldn't be enough. We're not just supposed to be testing the right version, we're supposed to be testing a specific egg or installation, so that we know that it is usable (not missing any needed files, for example). So we need to: 1. Fail if the code we are testing is not loaded from the expected egg or prefix directory. 2. Fail if the code in that directory is not the right Tahoe version. (Or, equivalently given that check 1 passes: fail if the code we are testing is not the right Tahoe version.) 3. Run the tests in such a way that the preceding checks don't fail. We should also consider checking constraints on the versions of our dependencies, but I think that's a separate ticket.
davidsarah commented 2010-07-27 04:35:10 +00:00
Author
Owner

Zooko wrote on IRC reformatted:

python -c
  import glob, os, subprocess, sys;
  trial = os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');
  os.chdir('.');
  testsuite = 'allmydata.test';
  os.chdir('egginstalldir');
  os.environ['PATH'] = os.getcwd() + os.pathsep + os.environ['PATH'];
  os.environ['PYTHONPATH'] = os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg')) + \
      os.pathsep + os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH', '');
  sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, testsuite], env=os.environ))

That is my attempt to ensure that it tests the right egg.
It is putting the right egg at the beginning of the PYTHONPATH before
running trial. Not good enough!
I *think* something may be inserting that other egg into the front of the
sys.path during python's startup proces.

where source:misc/build_helpers/run_trial.py@4434 is:

from twisted.scripts.trial import run; run()

The code that is messing up the sys.path is from the site.py installed by setuptools. The breakage is essentially the same as described in this message.

I don't know what to think about setuptools making a global change to Python's import semantics, that no-one but Phillip Eby (setuptools' maintainer) seems to think is a good idea, every time a setuptools package is installed. It seems like borderline malicious behaviour to me.

In any case, this may break the other places we run a program with a modified PYTHONPATH, in [run-with-pythonpath.py]source:misc/build_helpers/run-with-pythonpath.py@4434 and in the bin/tahoe script (generated from source:bin/tahoe-script.template).

Zooko wrote on IRC reformatted: ``` python -c import glob, os, subprocess, sys; trial = os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py'); os.chdir('.'); testsuite = 'allmydata.test'; os.chdir('egginstalldir'); os.environ['PATH'] = os.getcwd() + os.pathsep + os.environ['PATH']; os.environ['PYTHONPATH'] = os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg')) + \ os.pathsep + os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH', ''); sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, testsuite], env=os.environ)) That is my attempt to ensure that it tests the right egg. It is putting the right egg at the beginning of the PYTHONPATH before running trial. Not good enough! I *think* something may be inserting that other egg into the front of the sys.path during python's startup proces. ``` where source:misc/build_helpers/run_trial.py@4434 is: ``` from twisted.scripts.trial import run; run() ``` The code that is messing up the sys.path is from the `site.py` installed by setuptools. The breakage is essentially the same as described in [this message](http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2008-November/010534.html). I don't know what to think about setuptools making a global change to Python's import semantics, that no-one but Phillip Eby (setuptools' maintainer) seems to think is a good idea, every time a setuptools package is installed. It seems like borderline malicious behaviour to me. In any case, this may break the other places we run a program with a modified PYTHONPATH, in [run-with-pythonpath.py]source:misc/build_helpers/run-with-pythonpath.py@4434 and in the `bin/tahoe` script (generated from source:bin/tahoe-script.template).
davidsarah commented 2010-07-27 06:10:45 +00:00
Author
Owner

See also #145.

See also #145.
david-sarah@jacaranda.org commented 2010-07-28 20:03:02 +00:00
Author
Owner

In [4607/ticket1074]:

test_runner.py: add 'test_the_right_code', which partly addresses #1137
In [4607/ticket1074]: ``` test_runner.py: add 'test_the_right_code', which partly addresses #1137 ```
david-sarah@jacaranda.org commented 2010-07-29 00:59:53 +00:00
Author
Owner

In [4609/ticket1074]:

misc/build_helpers/run_trial.py: check that the root from which the module we are testing was loaded is the current directory. addresses #1137
In [4609/ticket1074]: ``` misc/build_helpers/run_trial.py: check that the root from which the module we are testing was loaded is the current directory. addresses #1137 ```
The current ticket1074 branch has a couple of interesting failures on my Mac OS 10.6 "zomp": * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/Zooko%20zomp%20Mac-amd64%2010.6%20py2.6/builds/66/steps/test-from-prefixdir/logs/stdio> * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/Zooko%20zomp%20Mac-amd64%2010.6%20py2.6/builds/66/steps/test-from-egg/logs/stdio>
davidsarah commented 2010-07-30 06:28:55 +00:00
Author
Owner

Replying to zooko:

The current ticket1074 branch has a couple of interesting failures on my Mac OS 10.6 "zomp":

Fixed in build 67 (which correctly complains that we're testing the wrong code, and says where it came from):

This was fixed by [4619/ticket1074].

Replying to [zooko](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78883): > The current ticket1074 branch has a couple of interesting failures on my Mac OS 10.6 "zomp": > * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/Zooko%20zomp%20Mac-amd64%2010.6%20py2.6/builds/66/steps/test-from-prefixdir/logs/stdio> Fixed in build 67 (which correctly complains that we're testing the wrong code, and says where it came from): * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/Zooko%20zomp%20Mac-amd64%2010.6%20py2.6/builds/67/steps/test-from-prefixdir/logs/stdio> * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/Zooko%20zomp%20Mac-amd64%2010.6%20py2.6/builds/67/steps/test-from-egg/logs/stdio> This was fixed by [4619/ticket1074].
david-sarah@jacaranda.org commented 2010-08-02 07:23:26 +00:00
Author
Owner

In [4624/ticket798]:

misc/build_helpers/run_trial.py: check that the root from which the module we are testing was loaded is the current directory. This version of the patch folds in later fixes to the logic for caculating the directories to compare, and improvements to error messages. addresses #1137
In [4624/ticket798]: ``` misc/build_helpers/run_trial.py: check that the root from which the module we are testing was loaded is the current directory. This version of the patch folds in later fixes to the logic for caculating the directories to compare, and improvements to error messages. addresses #1137 ```
davidsarah commented 2010-08-09 01:28:21 +00:00
Author
Owner

Tests fixed on trunk by changeset:3af6f19cb0f02fb4 and 4683..4687.

Now at least we know when we're testing the wrong code :-)

Tests fixed on trunk by changeset:3af6f19cb0f02fb4 and [4683..4687](http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/changeset?reponame=trunk&new=4687%40%2F&old=4682%40%2F). Now at least we know when we're testing the wrong code :-)
tahoe-lafs added
major
and removed
critical
labels 2010-08-09 01:28:21 +00:00
davidsarah commented 2010-08-10 07:16:02 +00:00
Author
Owner

Replying to davidsarah:

Now at least we know when we're testing the wrong code :-)

See #1165 for how we can more quickly know that we're testing the wrong code.

Replying to [davidsarah](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78886): > Now at least we know when we're testing the wrong code :-) See #1165 for how we can *more quickly* know that we're testing the wrong code.
davidsarah commented 2010-09-18 23:10:49 +00:00
Author
Owner

Equivalent bugs for pycryptopp and zfec:

Are there any other projects we need this for?

Equivalent bugs for pycryptopp and zfec: * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/pycryptopp/ticket/52> * <http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec/ticket/8> Are there any other projects we need this for?

Replying to davidsarah:

Are there any other projects we need this for?

There are no other projects that have run-tests-from-egg and run-tests-from-prefix-installdir steps.

Replying to [davidsarah](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78890): > Are there any other projects we need this for? There are no other projects that have run-tests-from-egg and run-tests-from-prefix-installdir steps.

Do you know how to fix it to run the right code?

class TestFromEgg(PythonCommand):
    """
    Step to run the Tahoe-LAFS tests from the egg-installation.
    """
    flunkOnFailure = True
    description = ["test-from-egg"]
    name = "test-from-egg"

    def __init__(self, testsuite=None, egginstalldir="egginstalldir", srcbasedir=".", *args, **kwargs):
        if testsuite:
            assert isinstance(testsuite, basestring)
            pcmd = (
                "import glob,os,subprocess,sys;"
                "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');"
                "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');"
                "testsuite='"+testsuite+"';"
                "os.chdir('"+egginstalldir+"');"
                "os.environ['PATH']=os.getcwd()+os.pathsep+os.environ['PATH'];"
                "os.environ['PYTHONPATH']=os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg'))+os.pathsep+os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH','');"
                "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, testsuite], env=os.environ))")

        else:
            pcmd = (
                "import glob,os,subprocess,sys;"
                "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');"
                "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');"
                "testsuite=subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, 'setup.py', '--name'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].strip()+'.test';"
                "os.chdir('"+egginstalldir+"');"
                "os.environ['PATH']=os.getcwd()+os.pathsep+os.environ['PATH'];"
                "os.environ['PYTHONPATH']=os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg'))+os.pathsep+os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH','');"
                "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, testsuite], env=os.environ))")

        python_command = ["-c", pcmd]
        logfiles = {"test.log": egginstalldir+"/_trial_temp/test.log"}
        kwargs['python_command'] = python_command
        kwargs['logfiles'] = logfiles
        PythonCommand.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
        self.addFactoryArguments(testsuite=testsuite, egginstalldir=egginstalldir, srcbasedir=srcbasedir)

class TestFromPrefixDir(PythonCommand):
    """
    Step to run the Tahoe-LAFS tests from a --prefix=installdir installation.
    """
    flunkOnFailure = True
    description = ["test-from-prefixdir"]
    name = "test-from-prefixdir"

    def __init__(self, testsuite=None, prefixinstalldir="prefixinstalldir", srcbasedir=".", *args, **kwargs):
        if testsuite:
            assert isinstance(testsuite, basestring)
            pcmd = (
                    "import copy,os,subprocess,sys;"
                    "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');"
                    "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');"
                    "testsuite='"+testsuite+"';"
                    "prefixinstdir=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir');"
                    "libdir=(('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'Lib', 'site-packages') or os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'lib', 'python%(ver)s' % {'ver': sys.version[:3]}, 'site-packages'));"
                    "bindir=('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and 'Scripts' or 'bin';"
                    "env=copy.copy(os.environ);"
                    "env['PATH']=bindir+os.pathsep+env.get('PATH','');"
                    "env['PYTHONPATH']=libdir+os.pathsep+env.get('PYTHONPATH','');"
                    "os.chdir('prefixinstalldir');"
                    "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, '--reporter=bwverbose', testsuite], env=env))")
        else:
            pcmd = (
                    "import copy,os,subprocess,sys;"
                    "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');"
                    "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');"
                    "testsuite=subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, 'setup.py', '--name'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].strip()+'.test';"
                    "prefixinstdir=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir');"
                    "libdir=(('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'Lib', 'site-packages') or os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'lib', 'python%(ver)s' % {'ver': sys.version[:3]}, 'site-packages'));"
                    "bindir=('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and 'Scripts' or 'bin';"
                    "env=copy.copy(os.environ);"
                    "env['PATH']=bindir+os.pathsep+env.get('PATH','');"
                    "env['PYTHONPATH']=libdir+os.pathsep+env.get('PYTHONPATH','');"
                    "os.chdir('prefixinstalldir');"
                    "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, '--reporter=bwverbose', testsuite], env=env))")
        python_command = ["-c", pcmd]
        logfiles = {"test.log": prefixinstalldir+"/_trial_temp/test.log"}
        kwargs['python_command'] = python_command
        kwargs['logfiles'] = logfiles
        PythonCommand.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
        self.addFactoryArguments(testsuite=testsuite, prefixinstalldir=prefixinstalldir, srcbasedir=srcbasedir)
Do you know how to fix it to run the right code? ``` class TestFromEgg(PythonCommand): """ Step to run the Tahoe-LAFS tests from the egg-installation. """ flunkOnFailure = True description = ["test-from-egg"] name = "test-from-egg" def __init__(self, testsuite=None, egginstalldir="egginstalldir", srcbasedir=".", *args, **kwargs): if testsuite: assert isinstance(testsuite, basestring) pcmd = ( "import glob,os,subprocess,sys;" "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');" "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');" "testsuite='"+testsuite+"';" "os.chdir('"+egginstalldir+"');" "os.environ['PATH']=os.getcwd()+os.pathsep+os.environ['PATH'];" "os.environ['PYTHONPATH']=os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg'))+os.pathsep+os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH','');" "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, testsuite], env=os.environ))") else: pcmd = ( "import glob,os,subprocess,sys;" "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');" "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');" "testsuite=subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, 'setup.py', '--name'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].strip()+'.test';" "os.chdir('"+egginstalldir+"');" "os.environ['PATH']=os.getcwd()+os.pathsep+os.environ['PATH'];" "os.environ['PYTHONPATH']=os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg'))+os.pathsep+os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH','');" "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, testsuite], env=os.environ))") python_command = ["-c", pcmd] logfiles = {"test.log": egginstalldir+"/_trial_temp/test.log"} kwargs['python_command'] = python_command kwargs['logfiles'] = logfiles PythonCommand.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs) self.addFactoryArguments(testsuite=testsuite, egginstalldir=egginstalldir, srcbasedir=srcbasedir) class TestFromPrefixDir(PythonCommand): """ Step to run the Tahoe-LAFS tests from a --prefix=installdir installation. """ flunkOnFailure = True description = ["test-from-prefixdir"] name = "test-from-prefixdir" def __init__(self, testsuite=None, prefixinstalldir="prefixinstalldir", srcbasedir=".", *args, **kwargs): if testsuite: assert isinstance(testsuite, basestring) pcmd = ( "import copy,os,subprocess,sys;" "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');" "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');" "testsuite='"+testsuite+"';" "prefixinstdir=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir');" "libdir=(('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'Lib', 'site-packages') or os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'lib', 'python%(ver)s' % {'ver': sys.version[:3]}, 'site-packages'));" "bindir=('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and 'Scripts' or 'bin';" "env=copy.copy(os.environ);" "env['PATH']=bindir+os.pathsep+env.get('PATH','');" "env['PYTHONPATH']=libdir+os.pathsep+env.get('PYTHONPATH','');" "os.chdir('prefixinstalldir');" "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, '--reporter=bwverbose', testsuite], env=env))") else: pcmd = ( "import copy,os,subprocess,sys;" "trial=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'misc', 'build_helpers', 'run_trial.py');" "os.chdir('"+srcbasedir+"');" "testsuite=subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, 'setup.py', '--name'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].strip()+'.test';" "prefixinstdir=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir');" "libdir=(('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'Lib', 'site-packages') or os.path.join(os.getcwd(), 'prefixinstalldir', 'lib', 'python%(ver)s' % {'ver': sys.version[:3]}, 'site-packages'));" "bindir=('win32' in sys.platform.lower()) and 'Scripts' or 'bin';" "env=copy.copy(os.environ);" "env['PATH']=bindir+os.pathsep+env.get('PATH','');" "env['PYTHONPATH']=libdir+os.pathsep+env.get('PYTHONPATH','');" "os.chdir('prefixinstalldir');" "sys.exit(subprocess.call([sys.executable, trial, '--reporter=bwverbose', testsuite], env=env))") python_command = ["-c", pcmd] logfiles = {"test.log": prefixinstalldir+"/_trial_temp/test.log"} kwargs['python_command'] = python_command kwargs['logfiles'] = logfiles PythonCommand.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs) self.addFactoryArguments(testsuite=testsuite, prefixinstalldir=prefixinstalldir, srcbasedir=srcbasedir) ```
davidsarah commented 2010-09-21 06:20:45 +00:00
Author
Owner

Replying to zooko:

Do you know how to fix it to run the right code?

No, but I think I know why this is happening (a bug in the site.py installed by setuptools that causes the sys.path entries to be added in the wrong order). I will file a bug against setuptools.

If I'm correct, it can't be fixed in the TestFromEgg and TestFromPrefixDir code, because they are corrrectly setting up PYTHONPATH, and the bug is in the sys.path setup in the invoked process.

Replying to [zooko](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78892): > Do you know how to fix it to run the right code? No, but I *think* I know why this is happening (a bug in the `site.py` installed by setuptools that causes the sys.path entries to be added in the wrong order). I will file a bug against setuptools. If I'm correct, it can't be fixed in the `TestFromEgg` and `TestFromPrefixDir` code, because they are corrrectly setting up PYTHONPATH, and the bug is in the sys.path setup in the invoked process.
davidsarah commented 2010-10-30 05:34:10 +00:00
Author
Owner

Replying to [davidsarah]comment:14:

Replying to zooko:

Do you know how to fix it to run the right code?

No, but I think I know why this is happening (a bug in the site.py installed by setuptools that causes the sys.path entries to be added in the wrong order). I will file a bug against setuptools.

That bug was probably not relevant to this ticket.

The fixes to #1190 seem to have fixed this issue as well; at least we're no longer getting any buildslave failures from the tests listed in comment:78886.

Replying to [davidsarah]comment:14: > Replying to [zooko](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78892): > > Do you know how to fix it to run the right code? > > No, but I *think* I know why this is happening (a bug in the `site.py` installed by setuptools that causes the sys.path entries to be added in the wrong order). I will file a bug against setuptools. That bug was probably not relevant to this ticket. The fixes to #1190 seem to have fixed this issue as well; at least we're no longer getting any buildslave failures from the tests listed in [comment:78886](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78886).
tahoe-lafs modified the milestone from soon (release n/a) to 1.8.1 2010-10-30 05:34:10 +00:00
davidsarah commented 2010-10-30 05:36:53 +00:00
Author
Owner

Replying to [davidsarah]comment:15:

The fixes to #1190 seem to have fixed this issue as well; at least we're no longer getting any buildslave failures from the tests listed in comment:78886.

OTOH, I'm not convinced that the

os.environ['PYTHONPATH']=os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg'))+os.pathsep+os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH','');

line in TestFromEgg (and similar in TestFromPrefixDir) are looking for the eggs in the right directory.

Replying to [davidsarah]comment:15: > The fixes to #1190 seem to have fixed this issue as well; at least we're no longer getting any buildslave failures from the tests listed in [comment:78886](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78886). OTOH, I'm not convinced that the ``` os.environ['PYTHONPATH']=os.pathsep.join(glob.glob('*.egg'))+os.pathsep+os.environ.get('PYTHONPATH',''); ``` line in `TestFromEgg` (and similar in `TestFromPrefixDir`) are looking for the eggs in the right directory.

You were right. I changed the buildmaster config for TestFromEgg so now it finds the eggs. I didn't extend TestFromPrefixDir to do that because the idea of TestFromPrefixDir is basically to see how things would work in a world without eggs.

You were right. I changed the buildmaster config for `TestFromEgg` so now it finds the eggs. I didn't extend `TestFromPrefixDir` to do that because the idea of `TestFromPrefixDir` is basically to see how things would work in a world without eggs.
davidsarah commented 2010-10-31 02:46:18 +00:00
Author
Owner

source:NEWS entry not needed because this is a buildslave issue (the user-visible bug was #1190).

source:NEWS entry not needed because this is a buildslave issue (the user-visible bug was #1190).

Okay I just changed the buildmaster so that failing test-from-prefixdir does not cause the build as a whole to be an orange warning (nor a red failure), since test-from-prefixdir is not something that we expect to work (except on systems where the system administrator has manually installed sufficient versions of all deps).

Okay I just changed the buildmaster so that failing test-from-prefixdir does not cause the build as a whole to be an orange warning (nor a red failure), since test-from-prefixdir is not something that we expect to work (except on systems where the system administrator has manually installed sufficient versions of all deps).
zooko added the
fixed
label 2010-10-31 05:46:11 +00:00
zooko closed this issue 2010-10-31 05:46:11 +00:00
davidsarah commented 2010-11-04 22:12:37 +00:00
Author
Owner

Replying to [davidsarah]comment:15:

The fixes to #1190 seem to have fixed this issue as well; at least we're no longer getting any buildslave failures from the tests listed in comment:78886.

Correction: #1246 is such a failure. (Since it has its own ticket, I'm not going to reopen this one.)

Replying to [davidsarah]comment:15: > The fixes to #1190 seem to have fixed this issue as well; at least we're no longer getting any buildslave failures from the tests listed in [comment:78886](/tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/1137#issuecomment-78886). Correction: #1246 is such a failure. (Since it has its own ticket, I'm not going to reopen this one.)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1137
No description provided.