handful of tidy-up patches from 1.7.1 cycle #1131
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1131
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I have three patches here which I chose to keep out of trunk during 1.7.1.
Please review!
Attachment three_cleanups.dpatch.txt (16171 bytes) added
Please wrap the lines longer than about 100 chars.
Also,
random_unicode
seems more general than it needs to be. (It would probably be slightly simpler to choose random unicode code points, rather than to choose a random UTF-8 encoding for each character and loop until it is valid, since the encoded length doesn't appear to be critical.)Otherwise looks fine. Please keep this ticket open so I can attach my own cleanup patches :-)
Replying to davidsarah:
Okay (grumble).
Yeah, for the purposes of this benchmark, it could even just be a random ascii string or something. How would one choose random unicode code points other than the way
random_unicode()
does it?Removing review-needed. I'll line-wrap, probably leave the silly
random_unicode()
as is, and commit the patch. Leaving this ticket open for other post-1.7.1 cleanup patches. :-)There's an uncommented print statement in
is_happy_enough
. Otherwise fine.Below is a patch to reformat lines to < 100 chars and to tidy up logging in immutable/upload.py.
Attachment tidy-up-logging.dpatch.txt (24549 bytes) added
Applied for 1.8beta in [4632/ticket798], [4634/ticket798], [4637/ticket798]. Uncommented print statement removed in [4636/ticket798].
... and [4633/ticket798].