Automatic detection of configuration changes. #72

Open
opened 2007-07-01 04:02:04 +00:00 by nejucomo · 2 comments

Wouldn't it be dandy if the client detected filesystem changes related to configuration (such as the creation/modification of $BASE/webport) and reacted appropriately?

Wouldn't it be dandy if the client detected filesystem changes related to configuration (such as the creation/modification of $BASE/webport) and reacted appropriately?
nejucomo added the
code
minor
enhancement
0.4.0
labels 2007-07-01 04:02:04 +00:00

yeah, eventually. I'm inclined to put this one off for a while, though.

yeah, eventually. I'm inclined to put this one off for a while, though.
warner added
code-nodeadmin
and removed
code
labels 2007-08-14 18:57:36 +00:00
zooko added this to the undecided milestone 2008-03-21 22:37:28 +00:00
warner modified the milestone from eventually to undecided 2008-06-01 20:53:07 +00:00

I think this requires more design before anything happens on it. Are ad hoc modifications to filesystem state the right way to deliver configuration changes to Tahoe-LAFS? Current thinking is probably that configuration control should be API-based instead of filesystem-based.

I think this requires more design before anything happens on it. Are ad hoc modifications to filesystem state the right way to deliver configuration changes to Tahoe-LAFS? Current thinking is probably that configuration control should be API-based instead of filesystem-based.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#72
No description provided.