tahoe dependencies not available for hardy-amd64 #644

Closed
opened 2009-02-26 08:59:23 +00:00 by zandr · 4 comments
zandr commented 2009-02-26 08:59:23 +00:00
Owner

Installing the hardy-amd64 tahoe-server deb reports the following:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  tahoe-server: Depends: python-foolscap (>= 0.3.0) but it is not installable
                Depends: python-pycryptopp (>= 0.5) but it is not installable
                Depends: python-zfec (>= 1.1) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages

/etc/apt/sources.list includes:

deb http://allmydata.org/debian hardy main tahoe
Installing the hardy-amd64 tahoe-server deb reports the following: ``` The following packages have unmet dependencies: tahoe-server: Depends: python-foolscap (>= 0.3.0) but it is not installable Depends: python-pycryptopp (>= 0.5) but it is not installable Depends: python-zfec (>= 1.1) but it is not installable E: Broken packages ``` /etc/apt/sources.list includes: ``` deb http://allmydata.org/debian hardy main tahoe ```
tahoe-lafs added the
unknown
major
defect
1.3.0
labels 2009-02-26 08:59:23 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added this to the undecided milestone 2009-02-26 08:59:23 +00:00

Someday we'll have fixed #422 (have buildslaves automatically build debian packages of foolscap, zfec, pycryptopp, etc.) and then I won't have to think about manually building .deb's ever again.

Someday we'll have fixed #422 (have buildslaves automatically build debian packages of foolscap, zfec, pycryptopp, etc.) and then I won't have to think about manually building .deb's ever again.
warner added
packaging
and removed
unknown
labels 2009-03-08 22:01:44 +00:00

#422 is pretty much fixed -- we have a way to automatically build and upload .deb's. We just need a Hardy-amd64 buildslave.

#422 is pretty much fixed -- we have a way to automatically build and upload .deb's. We just need a Hardy-amd64 buildslave.
zooko removed their assignment 2009-08-06 18:45:49 +00:00

Brian posted an update on this issue to the list:

http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2009-August/002547.html

Brian posted an update on this issue to the list: <http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2009-August/002547.html>

We're folding this into #769.

We're folding this into #769.
zooko added the
duplicate
label 2009-08-15 03:55:59 +00:00
zooko closed this issue 2009-08-15 03:55:59 +00:00
zooko added this to the eventually milestone 2009-10-27 22:05:34 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#644
No description provided.