XML-RPC interface #48
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#48
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Peter said he wanted an XML-RPC interface. Me, too! I nominate Brian to make one. ;-)
I've added a line to source:roadmap.txt about this. If you disagree or have other comments, Brian, please feel free to post to this ticket and to roadmap.txt.
I'm raising the priority of this because I want it a lot and because #53 -- command-line interface -- could use this to connect to the daemon. See #60 about the question of what it means -- if anything -- to raise the priority of a ticket.
This is assigned to me, and it is of high urgency.
Maybe I should have another look at WebDAV...
And we should definitely look at xuil (Brian is into this, too).
And the result might be more or less RESTful...
since we have a working RESTful interface now, and since we're starting to write a CLI around it, I'm lowering the priority of this one.
I'm happy with [the RESTful interface]source:docs/webapi.txt, and so far our customers -- Dmitry and MikeB -- seem happy with it, and our CLI customer -- Zandr -- seems okay with the CLI, so I'm losing interest in writing another interface.
I'll regain interest if I detect another customer who would prefer XML-RPC over [the RESTful interface]source:docs/webapi.txt.
Closing this as wontfix -- the RESTful interface is sufficient for now. This ticket will be reopened if we decide we want an XML-RPC interface.
(By the way, I recently heard that Amazon, which launched with both XML-RPC and REST, has 85% REST usage.)