build pycryptopp+zfec debs for hardy #469

Closed
opened 2008-06-17 23:20:04 +00:00 by warner · 4 comments

We've got a hardy buildslave set up, and it's producing tahoe debs, but these are uninstallable because they depend upon python-pycryptopp and python-zfec, which have not been packaged for hardy yet. It looks like python-pyutil and python-argparse might be required too.

This ticket will be resolved when suitable debs are installed in our APT repository (dev:~buildslave/tahoe-debs). deharo1 is available for building the packages, deharo2 is reserved for testing their installation (deharo2 pulls from the tahoe-debs APT repo).

We've got a hardy buildslave set up, and it's producing tahoe debs, but these are uninstallable because they depend upon python-pycryptopp and python-zfec, which have not been packaged for hardy yet. It looks like python-pyutil and python-argparse might be required too. This ticket will be resolved when suitable debs are installed in our APT repository (`dev:~buildslave/tahoe-debs`). deharo1 is available for building the packages, deharo2 is reserved for testing their installation (deharo2 pulls from the tahoe-debs APT repo).
warner added the
packaging
major
task
1.1.0
labels 2008-06-17 23:20:04 +00:00
warner added this to the undecided milestone 2008-06-17 23:20:04 +00:00
zooko was assigned by warner 2008-06-17 23:20:04 +00:00
zandr commented 2008-07-15 23:08:07 +00:00
Owner

We hit this again today trying to test our tahoe-server debs on deharo2.

As it stands now, Tahoe is not deployable by ops on Hardy.

This would be blocking deployment of new monitoring, if I hadn't already worked around this once.

We hit this again today trying to test our tahoe-server debs on deharo2. As it stands now, Tahoe is not deployable by ops on Hardy. This would be blocking deployment of new monitoring, if I hadn't already worked around this once.
Author

We hit this again today, trying to set up prodweb3 as an incident-gatherer server.

Zooko, what's your ETA on this one?

We hit this again today, trying to set up prodweb3 as an incident-gatherer server. Zooko, what's your ETA on this one?
warner added
critical
and removed
major
labels 2008-08-06 19:11:52 +00:00
Author

it looks like python-pyutil is required too, and python-argparse, at least the gutsy debs I found require them, so we need these packaged too.

it looks like python-pyutil is required too, and python-argparse, at least the gutsy debs I found require them, so we need these packaged too.

This has been fixed by cp'ing all the gutsy debs into the hardy repository.

See also the better, long-term fix: #498 (automate the production of .deb's of dependent libraries).

This has been fixed by cp'ing all the gutsy debs into the hardy repository. See also the better, long-term fix: #498 (automate the production of .deb's of dependent libraries).
zooko added the
fixed
label 2008-08-06 19:55:41 +00:00
zooko closed this issue 2008-08-06 19:55:41 +00:00
warner added this to the 1.3.0 milestone 2008-09-03 01:16:59 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#469
No description provided.