Support the creation of a new mutable object with a pre-determined signature key #3962
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#3962
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Sometimes you want to create or re-create a specific mutable object.
Two examples:
Currently this is not possible because the mutable creation APIs all randomly generate a new RSA key and use that. If you try to write the compliance test suite, all your mutable capabilities come out different each time because they each have a new random RSA key. If you want to embed a capability in an external system, you must create it first because otherwise you won't know what RSA key it includes (so you won't know the capability itself).
This is certainly an "advanced" feature. If poor choices are made specifying the RSA key then certain significant features of Tahoe will be compromised (eg, if you re-use a key expecting to get a different object, you will be sorely disappointed). Still, for advanced uses, it is very important.
And the "compliance test" issue is /tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25/issues/8611...
(https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/pull/1245)
Merged in https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/commit/7b768fdaca6404285776225ecf1f69af626fd053