add dependency on Twisted[tls]
to overcome pip's non-resolver #2760
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#2760
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Tahoe itself doesn't strictly depend on TLS support. It depends on Foolscap, which does, but in a perfect world Tahoe wouldn't have to know about that.
To ask Twisted to be TLS-capable, a package uses a square-bracketed "extra" in its dependencies, like
Twistedtls >= 15.2.1
instead of justTwisted >= 15.2.1
.In that perfect world, we'd have:
But unless/until we bypass the issue by using a requirements.txt file (maybe for #2055), we're affected by a missing pip feature: it lacks a full resolver.
A full resolver is what lets Debian's "apt" try all possible combinations of packages and versions to find any (hopefully the "best") that will meet the given constraints. It takes a lot more work, and is scarily powerful (someone once proved that the constraint solver is Turing-complete).
Pip installs the highest allowable version of the first thing that it encounters, and then explores the dependencies. It doesn't go back to try something different if the subsequent dependencies don't fit. And in particular, if it installs a package without any "extras", it won't go back and re-install it (with the extras) if it sees a later dependency that wants them.
So in the above example, when we install tahoe, pip will first install the latest version of Twisted it can find (e.g. 16.0.0, with no extras), then it installs foolscap, then, it sees that Foolscap wants
Twistedtls >= 16.0.0
. It knows it can satisfy the>= 16.0.0
requirement, but it can't go back and re-install thetls
extra. It emits a warning, but can't fix it.To overcome this, for the 1.11.0 release, we made Tahoe aware of the need for TLS, by using:
But this hits another problem, which is that Twisted didn't start offering the
tls
extra until 15.2.1 . So we're actually using:even though Tahoe, itself, doesn't need that recent of a Twisted version.
(incidentally, foolscap#249 is what added
Twistedtls
to Foolscap)This version bump might be inconvenient for OS packagers who are backporting the new tahoe-1.11.0 to older distributions that don't have the more recent Twisted. As I mentioned on the mailing list just now, porters who find themselves in this situation (and can't upgrade their Twisted packages) should consider modifying Tahoe's
src/allmydata/_auto_deps.py
to reduce this constraint back to the previous version. As long as there are OS-package-level dependency constraints on everything that the older version of Twisted needs for TLS support, things should work.(although note that the most recent version of Foolscap does, in fact, depend upon
Twisted >= 16.0.0
, so if you're upgrading that, you should probably go all-in and upgrade everything).This ticket is just to record the reasons for this version bump.
In d57c8d5/trunk: