clients shouldn't need to have persistent id #2335

Open
opened 2014-11-19 06:04:09 +00:00 by leif · 1 comment

Clients should have an anonymous mode of operation wherein they don't expose any persistent identifiers to servers. Maybe this mode could be the default?

In one accounting future, client identities would actually be necessary... but maybe there could be some blinded accounting tokens instead?

Clients should have an anonymous mode of operation wherein they don't expose any persistent identifiers to servers. Maybe this mode could be the default? In one accounting future, client identities would actually be necessary... but maybe there could be some blinded accounting tokens instead?
leif added the
unknown
normal
enhancement
1.10.0
labels 2014-11-19 06:04:09 +00:00
leif added this to the undecided milestone 2014-11-19 06:04:09 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added
code-network
and removed
unknown
labels 2014-11-19 07:29:22 +00:00

I believe this mailing list post is relevant to this ticket:

https://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2019-May/009943.html

I believe this mailing list post is relevant to this ticket: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2019-May/009943.html>
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#2335
No description provided.