Linux How to video comments Get vs CP #2259

Open
opened 2014-07-11 17:19:06 +00:00 by CyberAxe · 3 comments
CyberAxe commented 2014-07-11 17:19:06 +00:00
Owner

In the video by Taylor https://leastauthority.com/blog/least_authority_releases_s4+_as_part_of_reset_the_net.html

At 1:26 - He uses $Tahoe get URI:CHK:... instead of using $Tahoe cp

Why?

In the video by Taylor <https://leastauthority.com/blog/least_authority_releases_s4+_as_part_of_reset_the_net.html> At 1:26 - He uses $Tahoe get URI:CHK:... instead of using $Tahoe cp Why?
tahoe-lafs added the
unknown
normal
defect
1.10.0
labels 2014-07-11 17:19:06 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added this to the undecided milestone 2014-07-11 17:19:06 +00:00

Why not? Is there a problem with using tahoe get instead of tahoe cp?

Why not? Is there a problem with using `tahoe get` instead of `tahoe cp`?
CyberAxe commented 2014-07-12 00:00:50 +00:00
Author
Owner

Well, it should be explained that 'Tahoe get' can't do 'Tahoe cp -r' and/or '-v' which 'Tahoe cp' can. Is there something 'Tahoe cp' can't do which 'Tahoe get' can? If not then it seems logical that we standardize the use of 'Tahoe cp' to avoid confusion.
When restoring data 'Tahoe cp -r' and '-v' are pretty critical.

Well, it should be explained that 'Tahoe get' can't do 'Tahoe cp -r' and/or '-v' which 'Tahoe cp' can. Is there something 'Tahoe cp' can't do which 'Tahoe get' can? If not then it seems logical that we standardize the use of 'Tahoe cp' to avoid confusion. When restoring data 'Tahoe cp -r' and '-v' are pretty critical.

So, are you volunteering to make a new instructional video?

So, are you volunteering to make a new instructional video?
warner added
documentation
and removed
unknown
labels 2014-09-11 22:26:49 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#2259
No description provided.