cloud backend: prepare branch for LeastAuthority #2237

New Issue

tahoe-lafs · 2014-05-19T17:35:09Z

daira commented

2014-05-19 17:35:09 +00:00

This will be the branch that new customers of LeastAuthority's S4 product use. I want it to be separate from the 1819-cloud-merge branch (since that one is to be merged to Tahoe trunk which entails different stability requirements), but still in the tahoe-lafs github account.

tahoe-lafs added the

labels 2014-05-19 17:35:09 +00:00

tahoe-lafs added this to the soon milestone 2014-05-19 17:35:09 +00:00

daira commented

2014-05-19 17:38:21 +00:00

(https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/commits/2237-cloud-backend-s4)

(currently identical to 1819-cloud-merge)

(https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/commits/2237-cloud-backend-s4) (currently identical to 1819-cloud-merge)

daira commented

2015-07-10 05:42:12 +00:00

I rebased this branch to trunk at https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/commits/2237.cloud-backend-s4.1. This has lots of (hopefully shallow) test failures; Least Authority should continue to use 2237-cloud-backend-s4 for now.

I rebased this branch to trunk at <https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/commits/2237.cloud-backend-s4.1>. This has lots of (hopefully shallow) test failures; Least Authority should continue to use 2237-cloud-backend-s4 for now.

warner commented

2015-07-10 05:54:10 +00:00

thanks! I'll study the new branch.

daira commented

2016-04-22 15:13:47 +00:00

The 2237-cloud-backend-s4 branch is currently failing with this error:

Installed distribution Twisted 15.2.1 conflicts with requirement twisted[tls]>=16.0.0

I intend to rebase it to be up-to-date with the 1.11.0 release — which will also make it possible to land it soon.

The 2237-cloud-backend-s4 branch is currently failing with this error: ``` Installed distribution Twisted 15.2.1 conflicts with requirement twisted[tls]>=16.0.0 ``` I intend to rebase it to be up-to-date with the 1.11.0 release — which will also make it possible to land it soon.

daira commented

2016-04-22 18:02:23 +00:00

The current branch is https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/commits/2237.cloud-backend-s4.3.

The current branch is <https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/commits/2237.cloud-backend-s4.3>.

exarkun commented

2017-08-08 13:12:27 +00:00

Oops now the current branch is 2237.cloud-backend-merge.0

It is a very large branch. The plan which has been discussed regarding it is to incrementally select self-contained portions of it to be worked on, reviewed, completed, and merged into master separately (ie, in their own feature branches) and then rebase what remains of 2237.cloud-backend-merge.0 onto the new master, reducing the overall size of 2237.cloud-backend-merge.0. In this way, it is hoped that each piece can be given the attention it requires while the quantity of remaining work is gradually reduced to something manageable.

Oops now the current branch is 2237.cloud-backend-merge.0 It is a very large branch. The plan which has been discussed regarding it is to incrementally select self-contained portions of it to be worked on, reviewed, completed, and merged into master separately (ie, in their own feature branches) and then rebase what remains of 2237.cloud-backend-merge.0 onto the new master, reducing the overall size of 2237.cloud-backend-merge.0. In this way, it is hoped that each piece can be given the attention it requires while the quantity of remaining work is gradually reduced to something manageable.

exarkun commented

2017-08-10 12:38:26 +00:00

Ha ha. Actually, 2237.cloud-backend-s4-merged.4.

I'm going to delete the rest of the branches from the tahoe-lafs org repo and update this ticket to reflect the fact that all efforts are currently centered on this branch. I'm also going to close at least a couple other tickets having to do with related work but which aren't obviously going to be resolved independently.

Ha ha. Actually, 2237.cloud-backend-s4-merged.4. I'm going to delete the rest of the branches from the tahoe-lafs org repo and update this ticket to reflect the fact that all efforts are currently centered on this branch. I'm also going to close at least a couple other tickets having to do with related work but which aren't obviously going to be resolved independently.

exarkun commented

2020-10-22 17:47:34 +00:00

Least Authority is no longer pursuing this line of development.

exarkun added the

wontfix

label 2020-10-22 17:47:34 +00:00

exarkun closed this issue

2020-10-22 17:47:34 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.