no JSON output for node status (GET /?t=json) #2133
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#2133
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
According to the Web-API manual entry for
GET /
, "By adding "?t=json" to the URL, the node will return a JSON-formatted dictionary of stats values". I cannot reproduce this intended behaviour on my machine, and get a standard HTML page instead:I suspect this issue may have been introduced with the frontpage redesign.
AFAIK there has never been a JSON version of the Welcome page.
JSON output for GET / brokento no JSON output for node status (GET /?t=json)#1415 is tangentially related.
I feel that the ability to retrieve the Welcome page in JSON format (as documented) would be an important feature. In my particular usecase, I'm trying to implement storage grid monitoring/alerting - machine-readable connection status data would be essential for that. I'm reasonably sure that I'm not the only one with such a usecase.
I agree it would be a useful feature. I think the next step is to write (fuller) documentation for webapi.rst, maybe with an example of the JSON that should be output.
This would be useful for integration-testing to answer the question "is this node ready to actually-work".
(https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/2476) added a JSON version of the welcome page.