Allow deep-check to continue after error #1955
Labels
No Label
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1955
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
It would be useful to have
tahoe deep-check --repair
continue, even if one file cannot be repaired due to encountering a "not enough shares" error.Such as
At this point the deep-check aborts, even though the subsequent files can be successfully repaired.
To work around this I created a shoddy script that runs "tahoe deep-check -v --add-lease", saves the output to a file, then runs an individual repair on each file/directory that was reported as 'Unhealthy|Not Healthy'. My workaround may be kinda daft but until I remove the irreparable file(s)/director(y|ies), deep-checking won't complete.
Note: IIRC directories are Unhealthy and files are Not Healthy when deep-check is run without --repair. If run with --repair, not healthy is in lower case as shown above. I don't know if the inconsistency (i.e. case or not healthy VS unhealthy) is a bug (which is why I didn't file one for this), but I didn't expect it.
Duplicate of #755.
The difference in case is not intentional.