are we doing more readvs and writevs than necessary for some CLI or WUI operations? #1752

Open
opened 2012-05-31 20:56:26 +00:00 by davidsarah · 1 comment
davidsarah commented 2012-05-31 20:56:26 +00:00
Owner

For example, for a command of the form bin/tahoe put --mutable localfile URI:DIR2:.../filename (putting a new version of an existing mutable file in a mutable directory), we seem to be doing three readvs on the directory, and two readvs and a writev on the mutable file. This seems more than necessary.

(Test done on the cloud backend; not sure yet whether it also happens for trunk.)

For example, for a command of the form `bin/tahoe put --mutable localfile URI:DIR2:.../filename` (putting a new version of an existing mutable file in a mutable directory), we seem to be doing three readvs on the directory, and two readvs and a writev on the mutable file. This seems more than necessary. (Test done on the cloud backend; not sure yet whether it also happens for trunk.)
tahoe-lafs added the
code
normal
defect
1.9.1
labels 2012-05-31 20:56:26 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added this to the undecided milestone 2012-05-31 20:56:26 +00:00
davidsarah commented 2012-05-31 20:57:06 +00:00
Author
Owner

Assigning to me to do more tests.

Assigning to me to do more tests.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1752
No description provided.