README failure (confusion) #148

Closed
opened 2007-09-25 04:11:39 +00:00 by zooko · 4 comments

Nathan read the README and didn't realize that he had to manually satisfy the non-easy_install-able dependencies before doing "The easy_install Way".

http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2007-September/000169.html

Nathan read the README and didn't realize that he had to manually satisfy the non-easy_install-able dependencies before doing "The easy_install Way". <http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2007-September/000169.html>
zooko added the
unknown
major
defect
0.6.0
labels 2007-09-25 04:11:39 +00:00
zooko added this to the 0.6.1 milestone 2007-09-25 04:11:39 +00:00
nejucomo was assigned by zooko 2007-09-25 04:11:39 +00:00
zooko added
documentation
and removed
unknown
labels 2007-09-25 04:11:49 +00:00
Author

Darius Bacon and Peter Secor hit this exact same problem.

Darius Bacon and Peter Secor hit this exact same problem.
nejucomo was unassigned by zooko 2007-10-01 18:34:48 +00:00
zooko self-assigned this 2007-10-01 18:34:48 +00:00
Author

see changeset:bf8f3c297b1aab76

see changeset:bf8f3c297b1aab76
Author

Well, there is a new refactored README, but as far as I know nobody has tested it since I refactored it.

Well, there is a new refactored README, but as far as I know nobody has tested it since I refactored it.
Author

Well, I guess the only way we're going to get the new README tested is to release v0.6.1. ;-)

Well, I guess the only way we're going to get the new README tested is to release v0.6.1. ;-)
zooko added the
fixed
label 2007-10-13 20:15:14 +00:00
zooko closed this issue 2007-10-13 20:15:14 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#148
No description provided.