stray unrecoverable versions should be repaired by removal, not a new version #1210

Closed
opened 2010-09-23 23:39:25 +00:00 by gdt · 1 comment
Owner

If there are 1 shares of seqN and 10 shares of seqM, M>N, the file is not healthy. The fix should be to remove the seqN share and not molest the seqM shares, instead of incrementing the version. This contributes to instability.

If there are 1 shares of seqN and 10 shares of seqM, M>N, the file is not healthy. The fix should be to remove the seqN share and not molest the seqM shares, instead of incrementing the version. This contributes to instability.
tahoe-lafs added the
code
major
defect
1.8β
labels 2010-09-23 23:39:25 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added this to the undecided milestone 2010-09-23 23:39:25 +00:00
davidsarah commented 2011-01-14 18:48:22 +00:00
Author
Owner

Special case of #1209. I don't think it needs a separate ticket; we'll fix this at the same time.

Special case of #1209. I don't think it needs a separate ticket; we'll fix this at the same time.
tahoe-lafs added the
duplicate
label 2011-01-14 18:48:22 +00:00
davidsarah closed this issue 2011-01-14 18:48:22 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#1210
No description provided.